Rapture Network
The Rapture Report
The Rapture Newsletter
The Rapture Dashboard
The Rapture Alert
Featured Commentary
End Times News Headlines
End Times Charts
The Book of Revelation
The Rapture of the Church
Bible Prophecy Guide
End Times Signs
End Times Timeline
End Times Events
First Coming Prophecies
Second Coming Prophecies
Israel and the Middle East
Bible Prophecy and Reference
Roman Catholicism
Islam & Cultic Religions
Scripture Verses by Topics
Scripture Verse of the Day
Bible Prophecy Charts
Spurgeon's Daily Devotional
Creation vs. Evolution
Holy Bible Online
Commentary & Reference
Recommended Readings List
Salvation and Eternal Life
Doctrinal Statement & Beliefs
Christian Links
Link to Us
About Us
Contact Us
Fair Use Notice

Daily Bible Reading Plan

Jesus Is Coming Soon

Left Behind

The Miracles of Jesus Christ

Earth in Bible Prophecy

Who Is Gog/Magog of Ezekiel 38-39?

The Names of Jesus

Ezekiel 38-39 and Armageddon

Roman Catholicism

Stumble It Share to Reddit Share to Delicious

End Times Interpretations

End Times Interpretations
By Chris Schang

In the world of Bible prophecy there are four major types of end times interpretations. We will attempt to outline the various types of end times interpretations and show why the futurist, pre-millennial, and dispensationalist view of prophecy is the best interpretation in use today.

Futurist View - This view holds that end times prophecy is all in the future. Concerning the Book of Revelation the futurist believes that only Chapters 1-3 are directed to the apostle John's contemporaries. The prevalent view is that the events described in the end times are to be fulfilled in the future. The futurist's view is that while the rapture of the church is imminent, the end times events will play out in the future especially during the future tribulation period which would be the 70th week of Daniel. some end times events will take place before the tribulation period such as the re-birth of the state of Israel, but that the vast majority of the book of Revelation will be played out during the tribulation period.

Historicist View - This view holds that end times events have occurred in the past and that there are no end times events, especially from the book of Revelation to be fulfilled in the future. The historicist's views is that the apostle John was foretelling the future until the end of time which many historicists believe was fulfilled around 70 AD. The historicist's view is that Revelation primarily speaks of the battle between good and evil during the history of mankind. The historicist's view is inconsistent with the fact that Bible prophecy is currently being fulfilled literally in our time. The historicist view has to spiritualize away the end times and other events in order to deny the literal nature of Bible prophecy. Some historicists see Nero as the Antichrist and the destruction of Jerusalem and the Second Temple as being the end of Revelation. This view is simply not an accurate interpretation of the biblical scriptures. This view believes that the Second Coming is basically the reborn nature of a saved person, as opposed to a literal Second Coming of the Lord Jesus Christ to Earth. This is perhaps the hardest view to defend.

Preterist View - The Preterist view is the position that all end times Bible prophecy was fulfilled in the first century. Preterists believe that John was writing a timeless description of the rise and fall of evil in the world. the Preterist view does not take into account the current and literal fulfillments of Bible prophecy such as the re-birth of the modern state of Israel. Preterists do not believe that there are long term fulfillments of Bible prophecy and they spiritualize or consider things to be allegory when compared to other views. This view is not consistent with the scriptures and completely ignores the fulfillment of modern day prophecies starting with the re-birth of Israel.

Symbolic View - This view is as the name implies sees all Bible prophecy as being symbolic and not having anything to do with a literal fulfillment of the scriptures. Despite the fact that numerous First Coming prophecies where fulfilled literally, the symbolic viewer ignores these facts and simply tries to explain the various descriptions of the end times in ways that support their view. For example, the dragon in Revelation might be referred to as evil in general, whereas the futurist would argue that the Dragon is a description of Satan since he did try to kill the "man child" Jesus when he was born. The symbolic view does not follow the proper rules of interpretation by using the Bible to interpret the Bible as the scriptures say to do. The symbolic viewer is free to conclude that the various symbols and signs in Revelation are whatever they may want them to be, despite the fact that the symbols in Revelation are often explained in the book of Revelation and elsewhere in the Bible. The symbolic view of end times interpretation is faulty for these reasons.

It is this writer's view that the proper biblical interpretation of the Bible is to follow the futurist, pre-trib, pre-millennial, and dispensational view that holds that end times Bible prophecy is yet in the future and will be literally fulfilled as many of the First Coming prophecies were fulfilled. There is simply no logical reason to suggest that God would change his ways on fulfilling prophecy without saying so. This is supported by the fact that numerous end times Bible prophecy are currently being literally fulfilled as predicted by the Bible.

Donate to Rapture Forums

Rapture Wallpaper

Rapture Dashboard

Age of the Earth

End Times Timeline

50 Reasons We Are Living in the End Times

101 End Times Prophecy

Messianic Prophecies

Islam 101

America in Bible Prophecy

101 Science Facts from the Bible

Second Coming

100 Facts About Jesus

The Book of Revelation

Cults and Pagan Religions

Is the Antichrist Gog of Magog?

Gog and the Antichrist Revisited

Copyright © 2006-2017 Rapture Forums All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.